background

Evidence versus influence in the WHO procedure for approving essential medicines

Published
July 31st, 2014
Type
Staff Publication
Topic
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Authors
Winikoff, Beverly, Winikoff, B.

This letter was written as a response to a commentary stating that misoprostol for PPH prevention was added to the Essential Medicine’s List (EML) not because of evidence supporting its use but because of “influence and vested interest”. Winikoff refutes this argument by citing evidence that supports misoprostol for this use, and by documenting the history of misoprostol advocacy and research that together provide a strong rationale for EML inclusion. BMJ 2014;349:g4823.

Aceess the link.